ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Mailing List Directory]
[ltru List Information]
- [Ltru] Pinyin language?,
Mark Davis ☕
- Re: [Ltru] font features in CSS,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- [Ltru] Fw: [rt.amsl.com #20489] ltru WG milestone completion,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Fw: IESG Statement on Copyright,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] nomcom,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages,
rfc-editor
- [Ltru] RFC 5645 on Update to the Language Subtag Registry,
rfc-editor
- Re: [Ltru] WG chairs affiliation,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Fw: 76th IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Fw: 76th IETF - WG/BOF Scheduling,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] RFC 3282 revision,
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Nomination of Dough Ewell as Co-designated Expert,
Michael Everson
- [Ltru] Nomination of Michael Everson as Language Subtag Reviewer,
John Cowan
- [Ltru] [Fwd: Last Call for Language Tag experts as per draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23],
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Status of SF new clause inside ISO 3166-1///RE: Ltru Digest, Vol 54, Issue 2,
Lang Gérard
- [Ltru] Adding variant subtag 'erzgeb' for Erzgebirgisch (was: Requests that have been on hold),
CE Whitehead
- [Ltru] Any information on SF?,
Mark Davis ⌛
- [Ltru] ISO FDIS 639-6,
Debbie Garside
- [Ltru] New 4646bis IANA registry published,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?,
CE Whitehead
- [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?,
Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis,
Felix Sasaki
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
CE Whitehead
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry),
CE Whitehead
- [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering (to handle 639-6 or otherwise),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Gerard Meijssen
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Broome, Karen
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- [Ltru] Rechartering (in general),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Broome, Karen
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (wasFW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry),
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry),
CE Whitehead
- [Ltru] Fw: 75th IETF - Final Agenda,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] updated demo,
Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Discussion about the language name "Breton" and geography: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 63,
Lang Gérard
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
CE Whitehead
- [Ltru] Fw: Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Document Action: 'Update to the Language Subtag Registry' to Informational RFC,
The IESG
- [Ltru] Fw: Section Ordering in RFCs (Abstract Placement),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Status of 4645bis and 4646bis,
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Marion Gunn
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Marion Gunn
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Marion Gunn
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Marion Gunn
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] National origins of participants,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] National origins of participants,
Broome, Karen
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646,
Kent Karlsson
- [Ltru] FW: Lisa's comments on 4646bis,
Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] [Fwd: Lisa's comments on 4646bis],
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues (59, 61, 63, 62?),
Mark Davis ⌛
- [Ltru] Fw: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23.txt,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] [OT] Apology,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 43,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] draft-23 editor's copy updated,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata (Apps #13),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtagtype (Apps #11) (was RE: par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" ),
CE Whitehead
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Doug Ewell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13),
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Issue 63:,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Issue #63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #60: Require IETF Last Call for 2.2.1 (5) primary subtag case (Apps #12-b),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Code/code element/codet,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Schedule for this week,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- [Ltru] Code/code element/codetRE: Ltru Digest, Vol 52, Issue 7,
Lang Gérard
- Re: [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8),
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] On "code" in ISO standards,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type",
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
CE Whitehead
Re: [Ltru] Registering a primary language subtag (was: Additional issues with 4646bis...),
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Issue #40: AD #7 - section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value,
Alexey Melnikov
[Ltru] Followup on AD review of 4646bis,
Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Why so quiet?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] draft-23 is online...,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] In the interest of moving faster...,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [Fwd: Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsawg-operations-and-management (Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions) to BCP],
"Martin J. Dürst"
Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7),
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6),
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5),
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4),
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3),
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2),
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1),
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Issue #48 Hosting of mailing list (Apps #1),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62, AD issue #14 (Very remote risk of DoS),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62, AD issue #14 (Very remote risk of DoS),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62, AD issue #14 (Very remote risk of DoS),
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review,
Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] #55: Section 1 role/history (Apps #8),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
"Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #56: Section 2.1 syntax is not restrictive enough (Apps #9),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #57: Code / Subtag distinction (Apps #10),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #58: Add a summary of rules for recognizing subtag type (Apps #11),
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a),
Randy Presuhn
Mail converted by MHonArc
