Re: [manet] Some IDs and discussion items for Minneapolis

[Li Li <li.li@crc.ca>]

The service discovery draft  draft-koodli-manet-servicediscovery-00.txt 
seems to expire soon,
or already has expired? Is service discovery still a mandate of the working 
group? I have come
across requirements for service discovery in manet in my project. So I'm 
interested in finding out the status of this draft .

Thanks,

li li

Communications Research Center
Canada


At 05:53 PM 10/24/2003 -0400, Joe Macker wrote:
> All:
>
> In planning for Minneapolis, there are a couple items we would like make 
> the list aware of.
>
> First off, some of the existing WG documents under EXP submission are 
> still progressing.  We plan to review the status of those documents.
>
> Second, there are number of personal IDs that are related to some planned 
> discussions and I encourage people to review these (there may be others as 
> well).
>
> --------------
> The following relates to discussions on MANET-extensions and appropriate 
> interface design for OSPF (both v2 and v3 are possibly of interest).
>
> (1) Problem Statement for OSPF Extensions for Mobile Ad Hoc Routing
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-manet-ospf-problem-statement-00.txt
>
> (2) OSPFv2 Wireless Interface Type
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-spagnolo-manet-ospf-wireless-interface-00.txt
>
> --also Fred Baker's slides from 2002--
>
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/02mar/slides/manet-1/index.html
> --------------
>
> Of the 3 docs above, the MANET-OSPF problem statement document and some 
> potential consensus is the most important discussion at this point.  I 
> have discussed with the ADs that this might be an area that could be 
> worked in MANET with close OSPF coordination (many of the design issues 
> are MANET related).. The problem statement will be briefed likely at the 
> OSPF meeting as well.
>
> --------------
> The document has also been submitted looking forward from RFC 3651 and the 
> authors have requested some discussion time.
>
> Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing,
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-perkins-manet-aodvbis-00.txt
>
> --------------
>
> Other issues will be considered for discussion, an agenda is in the works, 
> but we wanted to first make people aware of the above.
>
> -Joe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet




_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet