Re: [manet] Encoding an IPv6 Mobile Network Prefix with PacketBB

[Thomas Clausen <T.Clausen at computer.org>]

On Jun 19, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:

> Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
> > > I hope someone can comment on this packet format: ok or not ok, how
> > >  should I encode it better?
> > Again, without studying it, what I would recommend is to take the  
> > regexp that is the formal definition, and break what you have down to
> >  match the elements in the regexp.
>
> That's what I did.
>
> ('regexp' means different things to different people: "?" has  
> different
>  meanings in gnu regexp vs dragon book - which one did you use?
>  Besides, I'm not used to reading messages specified with grammar
>  syntaxes, but I could try to understand the Augmented Backus-Naur  
> Form
>  RFC4234 which incidentally doesn't use '?' at all.)

The "?" and other such symbols used are described in the terminology  
section, exactly recognizing that it might be differently interpreted  
if not defined.

Thomas




_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet