Ian Chakeres wrote:
> I am not understanding the problem. Can you please provide me with
> the text to "fix" things for you?
Replace the "SHOULD" with a "MAY" in the paragraph below?
>>> The Intermediate DYMO router SHOULD also issue a RREP to the RREQ
>>> TargetNode, so that the RREQ TargetNode receives routing
>>> information on how to reach the RREQ OrigNode.
Alex
>
> Ian Chakeres
>
>
> On 7/6/07, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ian, thanks for updating the DYMO draft with, among others, updates
>> to the intermediate DYMO node section 5.3.3.
>>
>> I think it still needs updating, because the intermediate DYMO
>> router acting as a MANEMO Mobile Router should not send RREP to the
>> RREQ's Target Node (presumably this is the LFN) because LFN already
>> has a route to the MR (received either by RA as default route, or
>> statically configured) and because LFN doesn't speak DYMO anyways.
>> Currently the DYMO draft says:
>>
>>> The Intermediate DYMO router SHOULD also issue a RREP to the RREQ
>>> TargetNode, so that the RREQ TargetNode receives routing
>>> information on how to reach the RREQ OrigNode.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
>> System. For more information please visit
>> http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ manet mailing list
>> manet at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________