On Mon November 9 2009 03:06:45 Teco Boot wrote: > Hi Chris, > > You wrote: > >Fundamentally, all that needs to change in NHDP is > >- A relaxation of address reuse, but with the important caveat above. > >- A relaxation of required address inclusion, with the condition > > noted above. > > Is this implemented in -11? > It still says "All network addresses in a router's Local Interface Set". > And: > * Network addresses that include all source addresses of any IP > datagrams sent by the router on any MANET interface. > > I mentioned anycast addresses. Better not to include these in a hello > protocol. > I also highly prefer optimization, where the MANET router *only* advertises > summary prefixes, if available. This is applicable when multiple interfaces > are used, and doesn't harm the simple boxes using only one. > > On: > * All other network addresses of the router which are to be made > known to any other router for any reason. > > When there is no need for NHDP, let us not mandate including them in > hello messages. I think the idea behind this two points is that you can do two-hop routing even if you have not received TCs from your 2-hop neighbors. Henning Rogge -- Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE Kommunikationssysteme (KOM) Neuenahrer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany Telefon +49 228 9435-263, Fax +49 228 9435 685 mailto:henning.rogge at fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de GPG: E1C6 0914 490B 3909 D944 F80D 4487 C67C 55EC CFE0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.