Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-02.txt
Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> Tue, 07 May 2013 10:41 UTC
Return-Path: <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E4721F8C7D for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 03:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fv1h9HjEfUBX for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 03:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mx.fkie.fraunhofer.de (mailguard.fkie.fraunhofer.de [IPv6:2001:638:401:102:1aa9:5ff:fe5f:7f22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCB521F8C1A for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 03:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufsun5.fkie.fgan.de ([128.7.2.5] helo=mailhost.fkie.fraunhofer.de) by a.mx.fkie.fraunhofer.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>) id 1UZfKx-0003cv-SU for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 12:41:35 +0200
Received: from mailserv2bcas.fkie.fraunhofer.de ([128.7.96.56] helo=mailserv2.fkie.fraunhofer.de) by mailhost.fkie.fraunhofer.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>) id 1UZfKx-00011r-Po for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 12:41:35 +0200
Received: from [128.7.5.36] (128.7.5.36) by MAILSERV2BCAS.lorien.fkie.fgan.de (128.7.96.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 7 May 2013 12:41:35 +0200
Message-ID: <5188DA58.2080704@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 12:41:28 +0200
From: Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: manet@ietf.org
References: <20130505151526.3223.18240.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <001301ce49d9$eef2e630$ccd8b290$@olddog.co.uk> <CADnDZ89-i2gK6fDZNYi_t1QCxm03XuxdFRLtkYP_YQrMZw=omw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89-i2gK6fDZNYi_t1QCxm03XuxdFRLtkYP_YQrMZw=omw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms000208090906060303020800"
X-Originating-IP: [128.7.5.36]
X-Virus-Scanned: yes (ClamAV 0.97.8/17163/Tue May 7 09:58:45 2013) by a.mx.fkie.fraunhofer.de
X-Scan-Signature: 2f486c1bd65b83532f5a9ca975ef026a
Subject: Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-02.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:41:43 -0000
On 05/07/2013 11:36 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > Hi Ogier, > I was interested to find the RFC5444 format (MANET messaging format) > in the I-D. The document is for the manet case so why does it not use > RFC5444 in its work? Do you think using RFC5444 is not a good idea in > this I-D, please explain? Read the title of the document again... you will notice the "OSPF". the OSPF Manet-Extension has been developed in the OSPF working group using the OSPF message format. Henning Rogge -- Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE Kommunikationssysteme (KOM) Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany Telefon +49 228 9435-961, Fax +49 228 9435 685 mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Abdussalam Baryun
- [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-sin… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-sin… Stan Ratliff (sratliff)
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Joe Macker
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-manet… Abdussalam Baryun