I say we should adopt this document as a WG doc, multitopology routing
without the need of multiple completely independent OLSRv2 instances
is one of the missing features of the protocol.

As I discussed with Christopher in Berlin we at Fraunhofer FKIE see
already two applications for MTR... one is multi-metric routing (e.g.
one metric measuring airtime use, another one delay), the other one is
overlapping network partitions (let everyone participating in normal
messages, but keep "priority/secret" messages among a subgroup of
nodes you explicitly trust).

Henning Rogge

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Stan Ratliff (sratliff)
<sratliff@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hello again working group participants -
>
> Ulrich reminds me that open-ended questions such as the one I asked are
> usually not a good idea. Therefore, I'll rephrase:
>
> If there are any significant objections to accepting this document as a WG
> doc, please post to the list by Feb. 7. Otherwise, we will consider lack of
> comment as acceptance, and make the draft a WG document.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Chris/Thomas,
>
> My apologies for the delay.
>
> Working Group,
>
> What say you? Do we have consensus to proceed with this document as a WG
> doc?
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
>  wrote:
>
> Joe, Stan,
>
> have you received the below email? Can you please respond?
>
> Thanks
> Ulrich
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
> Date: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:44 PM
> Subject: Re: draft-dearlove-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-02 -> WG
> To: Christopher Dearlove <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
> Cc: Joe Macker <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>, Stan Ratliff
> <sratliff@cisco.com>, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>, Adrian Farrel
> <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
>
>
> Dear WG chairs, WG secretary, Area Director,
>
> First, happy new year. I hope that you were able to spend some time with
> your loved ones over the holidays, and that health and happiness may be with
> you in the new year.
>
> I wanted to remind you of the request from Chris (below), sent to you a bit
> more than a month ago. As I've seen no emails from you to regarding this, I
> permit myself to reiterate the request for WG adoption of
> draft-dearlove-manet-olsrv2-multitopolgy-02 - so that we may advance also
> this document forward, hopefully rapidly, towards publication as
> experimental RFC.
>
> Thank you in advance for your consideration.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Thomas
>
> On 20 Dec 2013, at 17:07 , Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
> <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com> wrote:
>
> Joe, Stan
>
> We have submitted draft-dearlove-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-02, which
> includes what we knew we were missing from the previous draft.
>
> We would therefore like to ask the WG to accept this. Obviously this close
> to the Christmas/New Year holiday, after those (as immediately after those
> as possible) would be appropriate. (Same timeframe as IETF LC on other
> drafts I hope).
>
> In the meanwhile, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all,
>
> Christopher
>
> --
> Christopher Dearlove
> Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
> Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
> Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
> chris.dearlove@baesystems.com | http://www.baesystems.com
>
> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
> Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>