Re: [feedback-report] ESP (was Re: ARF working group interest?)
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 09 September 2009 08:22 UTC
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n898Movu001953 for <abuse-feedback-report@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:22:56 -0700
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 ale@tana.it, TLS: TLS1.0, 256bits, RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with esmtp; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:42:31 +0200 id 00000000005DC031.000000004AA75C67.00003DC0
Message-ID: <4AA75C68.4020405@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:42:32 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
References: <4AA6BE96.90501@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <4AA6BE96.90501@cybernothing.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:40:18 by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: abuse-feedback-report@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [feedback-report] ESP (was Re: ARF working group interest?)
X-BeenThere: abuse-feedback-report@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public forum for discussion on the feedback-report draft <abuse-feedback-report.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/abuse-feedback-report>, <mailto:abuse-feedback-report-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/abuse-feedback-report>
List-Post: <mailto:abuse-feedback-report@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abuse-feedback-report-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/abuse-feedback-report>, <mailto:abuse-feedback-report-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:22:58 -0000
J.D. Falk wrote: > I'm partial to the term "mailbox provider," but that's still relatively new. +1, as it is less ambiguous.
- Re: [feedback-report] ESP (was Re: ARF working gr… Alessandro Vesely
- [feedback-report] ESP (was Re: ARF working group … J.D. Falk