Re: [MBONED] 224.0.0.12

[Dave Thaler <dthaler at windows.microsoft.com>]

Perhaps Brian Haberman can comment on FLIP?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucy Lynch [mailto:llynch at civil-tongue.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:44 AM
> To: Dave Thaler
> Cc: Marshall Eubanks; mboned at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MBONED] 224.0.0.12
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2009, Dave Thaler wrote:
>
> > I couldn't find anything either, although it appears to have
> > been mentioned in
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mukherjee-dhc-dhcproam-00
> > but then removed from version -01.
>
> ah, but either 00 or 01 is worth a quick look *just* for the ascii art:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mukherjee-dhc-dhcproam-01
>
> see fig. 2
>
> FWIW, there is also a mention in:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandiick-flip-00
>
> 7.1 All-FLIP-Peers
>
> The All-FLIP-Peers multicast address has the following possible values:
>
>             o  IPv4 _ 224.0.0.12
>             o  IPv6 _ FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:C
>
>
> individual submission, c.2000
>
> - Lucy
>
> > -Dave
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: mboned-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces at ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Marshall Eubanks
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:31 PM
> >> To: Marshall Eubanks
> >> Cc: mboned at ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [MBONED] 224.0.0.12
> >>
> >> Unless someone speaks up by June 6th this will be removed from the
> >> IANA list and would probably eventually be reassigned.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Marshall
> >>
> >> On May 23, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> >>
> >>> In the IANA list
> >>>
> >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses/
> >>>
> >>> 224.0.0.12 is listed as
> >>>
> >>> 224.0.0.12 DHCP Server / Relay Agent [RFC1884]
> >>>
> >>> This address is manifestly not assigned in RFC 1884 (which deals
> >>> with IPv6), and a search on my part reveals only
> >>> that DHCP-AGENTS.MCAST.NET resolves to 224.0.0.12
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone know what, if anything, this address is really used
> for,
> >>> and on what authority ?
> >>>
> >>> My suspicion at present is that this may be a lame delegation.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Marshall
> >>>
> >>> P.S. Bob Hinden says
> >>>
> >>>> After doing some searches, it looks like the 224.0.0.12 multicast
> >>>> was defined in a draft "Extensions to DHCP for Roaming Users"
> >>>> <draft-mukherjee-dhc-dhcproam-00.txt>.  This appears to be where
> >>>> the incorrect reference is.
> >>>>
> >>>> The next version of that draft -01 does not have the definition.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> MBONED mailing list
> >>> MBONED at ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MBONED mailing list
> >> MBONED at ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MBONED mailing list
> > MBONED at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> >