|
We have a classic case of this scenario with
our response shown below As you see we respond to both Actions. Hope
this helps John !/2 [w.x.y.z]:20000 T=284515136 { C=*{ O-AV=A1{ AT{M,E}}}, C=-{ O-AV=A1{ AT{M,E}}}} MEGACO/2 [a.b.c.d]:2084 REPLY = 284515136 { CONTEXT = * { AUDITVALUE = A1 { ERROR = 435
{ "Termination ID is not in specified Context" } } }, CONTEXT = - { AUDITVALUE = A1 { EVENTS =
84412159 { AL/ON,
MEDIA {
TERMINATIONSTATE { SERVICESTATES = INSERVICE,
BUFFER = OFF } } } } } The information contained in this message may be confidential, privileged or protected from disclosure. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy, disseminate or disclose the contents of this message to anyone. From:
megaco-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:megaco-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nurit Shenhar Hi
all Assuming
we have two actions in a transaction, the first refers to ALL contexts and the
second refers to the NULL context, what should be the correct treatment if
there are no active contexts on the gateway? Should the second action be
performed? The
standard refers to the case in which a command fails, but not to the case in
which the action fails. Thanks, Nurit Shenhar Control and management Leader
Email: nurits at audiocodes.com Tel. +972-3-9764155 Fax. +972-3-9764223
This email and any files transmitted with
it are confidential material. They are intended solely for the use of the
designated individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, use, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. |
_______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list Megaco at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco