Thanks for the clarification. So one MGC can control multiple MGs. Does the
MGC need multiple mid, one for each MG? Or the MGC needs one only mid and
every MGs send to the same MGC using the same mid of the MGC?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor at rogers.com> wrote:
You should be able to control multiple virtual MG from one MGC instance if
you need to. I can see a simple use case for this, where the normal MGC for
one of the virtual MGs has failed and an MGC controlling another virtual MG
takes its place. I am sure there are other applications.
And yes, you can multiplex control associations for multiple virtual MGs
over the same physical connection. You would have to take some care not to
clear down the connection just because one virtual MG is doing a restart.