[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MEXT] Removing bindings for IPv4 only - please comment
- To: Hesham Soliman <hesham at elevatemobile.com>, "mext at ietf.org" <mext at ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [MEXT] Removing bindings for IPv4 only - please comment
- From: "Giaretta, Gerardo" <gerardog at qualcomm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:47:33 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>, Julien Laganier <julien.laganier.ietf at googlemail.com>
- Delivered-to: ietfarch-mext-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
- Delivered-to: mext at core3.amsl.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=gerardog at qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1229114867; x=1260650867; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:x-ironport-av; z=From:=20"Giaretta,=20Gerardo"=20<gerardog at qualcomm.com> |To:=20Hesham=20Soliman=20<hesham at elevatemobile.com>,=20" mext at ietf.org"=20<mext at ietf.org>|CC:=20marcelo=20bagnulo =20braun=20<marcelo at it.uc3m.es>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20 =20=20Julien=20Laganier=0D=0A=09<julien.laganier.ietf at goo glemail.com>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Jari=20Arkko =20<jari.arkko at piuha.net>|Date:=20Fri,=2012=20Dec=202008 =2012:47:33=20-0800|Subject:=20RE:=20Removing=20bindings =20for=20IPv4=20only=20-=20please=20comment|Thread-Topic: =20Removing=20bindings=20for=20IPv4=20only=20-=20please =20comment|Thread-Index:=20AclcIrfbppqowVDjTEy3HFmjbORgHQ AeBgSg|Message-ID:=20<057632CE4CE10D45A1A3D6D19206C3A3D6E 298D8 at NASANEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>|References:=20<C5684F8 6.AAE2%hesham at elevatemobile.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<C5684F86 .AAE2%hesham at elevatemobile.com>|Accept-Language:=20en-US |Content-Language:=20en-US|X-MS-Has-Attach: |X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage:=20en-US |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii" |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi=3D"5 300,2777,5461"=3B=20a=3D"13917084"; bh=+UlySbE74vLaN5c5rt6xWHP6THW3lqOR1QuJh9rC7f8=; b=EwqGz3p61NIBJkHhZLAlc+6dTR/TAqqrtWM2m+9zDR/pMpYpKebHUd8W JUmaOCWq7tjMG/M0IqoT0FWpDryKbIjeAMyDR9bs6p4IrYW1gY7rcNqqz m+JQIDlq2iOf/tNcxVqGw4RK6vGe4AhUwU7Ng6x3utIyHueC5Wfg4esPF 0=;
- In-reply-to: <C5684F86.AAE2%hesham at elevatemobile.com>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
- List-help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <C5684F86.AAE2%hesham at elevatemobile.com>
- Sender: mext-bounces at ietf.org
- Thread-index: AclcIrfbppqowVDjTEy3HFmjbORgHQAeBgSg
- Thread-topic: Removing bindings for IPv4 only - please comment
Thanks Hesham - I think this text covers the case I was referring to
Gerardo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hesham Soliman [mailto:hesham at elevatemobile.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:28 PM
> To: mext at ietf.org
> Cc: Giaretta, Gerardo; marcelo bagnulo braun; Julien Laganier; Jari Arkko
> Subject: Removing bindings for IPv4 only - please comment
>
> Hi all,
>
> Gerardo requested that we consider the issue of removing an IPv4-only
> bindings in the spec. We discussed this with the chairs and it seemed like a
> simple add-on to the spec. I'm still wondering if this is the same thing
> that Karen asked for earlier and we decided to do it separately. If it is,
> then I don't understand why we didn't consider the following solution (can't
> remember if I suggested it before).
>
> I've added the following text to the draft, please let me know if you have
> any comments ASAP. I want to submit this version on the weekend if possible.
> All the IESG comments have been included. It's pretty straight forward and
> follows standard MIPv6 logic.
>
> <section title="Removing Bindings">
>
> <t>Mobile nodes will remove bindings from the home agent's binding cache
> whenever they move to the home link, or simply when mobility support is not
> needed.</t>
>
> <t>De-registering the IPv6 home address is described in <xref
> target="RFC3775"/>. The same mechanism applies in this specification. Mobile
> nodes may remove the binding for the IPv4 home address only, by sending a
> binding update that does not include the IPv4 home address option. Upon
> receiving this binding update, the home agent will replace the existing
> cache entries with the content of the new message. This ensures that the
> IPv4 home address binding is removed, while maintining an IPv6 binding.</t>
>
> <t>Note that the mobile node cannot remove the IPv6 home address binding
> while maintaining an IPv4 home address binding.</t>
>
> <t>A binding update message with a lifetime of zero, will remove all
> bindings for the mobile node.</t>
> </section>
>
> Hesham
>
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext