Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration after Separate Binding Registration in MCoA

[Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa at gmail.com>]

Hi Desire,

I can add some texts in the Security Consideration Section.

ryuji

On 2008/12/18, at 18:46, Desire Oulai wrote:

> Hi Benjamin,
>
> If initial bindings are done by separate registration, we can assume
> that CoA verification is done as each BU as the corresponding CoA as
> source address. Therefore, the MN can perform bulk re-registration or
> deregistration. Ruyji, should we have some text related to this in the
> draft?
>
> BR
>
> Desire
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benjamin Lim [mailto:benjamin.limck at sg.panasonic.com]
> > Sent: December 18, 2008 1:52 AM
> > To: Ryuji Wakikawa
> > Cc: Desire Oulai; mext at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [MEXT] Bulk Binding Refresh or Deregistration
> > after Separate Binding Registration in MCoA
> >
> > Hi Ryuji,
> >
> > Ryuji Wakikawa wrote:
> > > > However, is it possible for a MN to do separate binding
> > registration
> > > > then do bulk binding refresh or bulk deregistration?
> > >
> > > Yes, MN can switch to bulk registration after the separate
> > registration.
> > [Ben] So does the HA accept this bulk registration BU from
> > the MN based on the fact that MN has previously done separate
> > binding registration?
> > Or does it do some form of CoA verification?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Benjamin Lim
> >
> > > regards,
> > > ryuji
> > >
> > >
> > > > BR
> > > >
> > > > Desire
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MEXT mailing list
> > > MEXT at ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext