Re: [MEXT] Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-03.txt

[Qin Wu <sunseawq at huawei.com>]

Hello,
>> 2; What combinations are possible? What triggers may be used 
>> with the 'G' bit? Some triggers have been indicated that they 
>> should be used with 'G', but others do not. Some combinations 
>> do not make sense. Does 'G'
>> ONLY work with those explicitly specified? If so, what should 
>> one do with the other combinations if they appear?
>
> [Ahmad]
> Yes, Global Revocation is meant to communicate a Mass revocation which
> impact all mobility sessions between the pair MAG-LMA. Another use case
> was discussed to allow the LMA, for example, to revoke multiple sessions
> that belong to all MN(s) which share a specific criteria, e.g., MN-ID
> belong to a certain realm. The receiving node need to be able to
> differentiate between the two cases. Thus, there was two different
> Revocation Triggers.
>Any other combinations of (G) bit and other R. T. is NOT supported. IMO,
>the receiving node should reject that BRI.
>We can add text for this one. 

Sound good to me, But I wonder whether multiple sessions reovocation for Proxy MIPv6 use case  is covered in the draft?
Because in the section 3.4.2, only global revocation is covered.

Regards!
-Qin