[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis: BU de-registration

To: "QIU Ying" <qiuying at i2r.a-star.edu.sg>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis: BU de-registration
From: arno at natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:07:21 +0100
Cc: mext <mext at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: mext at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <B2203A24905F44A1953A7D3F4E15D005 at t3400> (QIU Ying's message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:42:59 +0800")
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <49C96B43.40004 at gmail.com> <B2203A24905F44A1953A7D3F4E15D005 at t3400>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

"QIU Ying" <qiuying at i2r.a-star.edu.sg> writes:

> Agree with Michael comment:

Sorry but which comment are you refering to?

> HA deletes the BCE as well as the related
> SA from SAD at the same time. Then the coming BU will be dropped
> simply due to no associated SA.
>
> Anyway, the ralated SA will be deleted/updated when its lifetime is
> expired. So the question here is: after deleting the SA, does MIP6
> need to send a notice to IKE that a SA is deleted?

Cheers,

a+

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis: BU de-registration
  - From: QIU Ying

References:
- [MEXT] IPsec vs other
  - From: Alexandru Petrescu
- [MEXT] RFC3775bis: BU de-registration
  - From: QIU Ying

Prev by Date: [MEXT] MIP6 Security architecture
Next by Date: Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis: BU de-registration
Previous by thread: Re: [MEXT] MIP6 Security architecture
Next by thread: Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis: BU de-registration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread