[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MEXT] weird idea about flow bindings



Suresh Krishnan escribió:
Hi Marcelo,

On 17/05/09 08:58 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
ok, let me try again because it seems i am failing miserably to communicate what i want to say (or it simply so broken that people cannot believe what they are reading :-)

I think it is a cool idea but it is very hard to realize in practice since it needs CNs to be changed.

Suppose now that the app2 in the CN starts a flow to the MN. According to RFC3697, the CN SHOULD assign a different flow label to the packets belonging to this flow e.g. to this TCP connection.

This is the crux of the issue. Almost every implementation I have seen sets the flow label to zero. This falls under the category "A source node which does not assign traffic to flows MUST set the Flow Label to zero.". Add to this the fact that compliance to RFC3697 is completely optional (it is not even mentioned in RFC4294), and this task quickly becomes pretty improbable.
right
i am slowly understanding this is the case
I think we should update rfc3697 to obtain a better use of the flow label, but i agree that its usage for flow bindings can not be immediate (i.e. with current implementations)

Regards, marcelo



Thanks
Suresh