Re: [MEXT] About the flow binding charter item

[George Tsirtsis <tsirtsis at googlemail.com>]

But is this about multiple HoAs belonging to a given MN, on the same HA?

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Hesham Soliman
<hesham at elevatemobile.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> 2.b. Affect CoA only, and/or HA address ?
>>>
>>
>> GT> Could someone elaborate on the "HA address" part? what is this all about?
>
> => Historically monami6 was trying to allow for multihoming of both HoA and
> CoA. There was no concensus/IESG approval for such WG in paris but everyone
> agreed that we can start with CoA multihoming but do an analsysis doc for
> both.
> I assume this "left-over" wording about HA address selection is a really bad
> attempt to preserve something from the multiple HoA sceanrio. But I think
> it's at best confusing to have such text and when you actually try to read
> this sentence and see what it means you discover it makes no sense at all.
>
> Hesham
>
>>
>>>
>>> and we wanted to influence the choice of the HoA too though this was not
>>> agreed for setting up MonAmi6 as a group so this was rephrased and HA
>>> address appeared instead, as a compromise. I wish we keep the possibility to
>>> influence the choice of the HA address.
>>>
>>> Now, this said, the current drafts may or may not address all of these (they
>>> may not if this would bring them to square one as we need these draft to be
>>> published), but these shall be kept in the charter, definitely.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Thierry
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Julien and marcelo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>> MEXT at ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT at ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>
>