[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis dereg issue
Hi Charlie,
On 10/12/09 12:49 PM, "Charles Perkins" <charles.perkins at earthlink.net>
wrote:
>
>
> Hello Basavaraj,
>
> What if I add another clause, to say that the mandate
> is placed when the Binding Update came from a mobile
> node on the same link?
I think that would work.Thx.
-Basavaraj
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
> Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com wrote:
>> Hi Charlie,
>>
>> In Rev 5 of the I-D posted at the URL in your earlier email, Sec 10.3.2
>> states:
>>
>> "
>> When the Status
>> field in the Binding Acknowledgement is greater than or equal to 128
>> and the Source Address of the Binding Update is on the home link, the
>> home agent MUST send it to the mobile node's link layer address
>> (retrieved either from the Binding Update or through Neighbor
>> Solicitation).
>>
>> "
>>
>> The MN may be on a virtual HL and hence there may not be a LLA for the MN to
>> which the BAck can be sent. IMO the above sentence should be revised by
>> deleting the part about sending it to the LLA and the clarification in the
>> parentheses.
>>
>> -Basavaraj
>>
>>
>>
>>
>