[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MEXT] RFC3775bis dereg issue



Hi Charlie,


On 10/12/09 12:49 PM, "Charles Perkins" <charles.perkins at earthlink.net>
wrote:

> 
> 
> Hello Basavaraj,
> 
> What if I add another clause, to say that the mandate
> is placed when the Binding Update came from a mobile
> node on the same link?

I think that would work.Thx.

-Basavaraj

> 
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 
> 
> Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com wrote:
>> Hi Charlie,
>> 
>> In Rev 5 of the I-D posted at the URL in your earlier email, Sec 10.3.2
>> states:
>> 
>> "
>> When the Status
>>    field in the Binding Acknowledgement is greater than or equal to 128
>>    and the Source Address of the Binding Update is on the home link, the
>>    home agent MUST send it to the mobile node's link layer address
>>    (retrieved either from the Binding Update or through Neighbor
>>    Solicitation).
>> 
>> "
>> 
>> The MN may be on a virtual HL and hence there may not be a LLA for the MN to
>> which the BAck can be sent. IMO the above sentence should be revised by
>> deleting the part about sending it to the LLA and the clarification in the
>> parentheses.
>> 
>> -Basavaraj
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>