Comments (a detailed review will be done when the draft has been updated)
There has been a lengthy discussion on the mailing list regarding support for bidirectional transfer of flow descriptors. A number of arguments have been stated both in favor of bidirectional transfer and against it. I'm in favor of adding support for bidirectional transfer and believe it should be added according to what has previously been agreed in the WG charter.
There has also been a discussion about support for binary and ASCII flow descriptors. The draft is currently written only to fit the binary format. I see no reason for this approach. The draft could easily be changed to fit both formats.
I see no reason for draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03 to be forwarded to IESG before the above issues have been fixed.
Regards
Conny
Laganier, Julien wrote:
Folks, Hereby we're starting a two weeks WGLC on our "Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO Basic Support" document, available at the following URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03> Please review the specification, post your comments to the mailing list, and state whether or not you think the document is ready to be forwarded to IESG before 2009-10-20 6:00PM PST. Thank you for your support. --julien & marcelo, MEXT chairs _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list MEXT at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
--
CONNY
LARSSON M.Sc.
Senior Research Engineer
Ericsson AB
Ericsson Research, Packet Technologies
Isafjordsgatan 14E
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone +46 10 714 8458
SMS/MMS +46 70 267 3556
Conny.Larsson at ericsson.com
www.ericsson.com
