Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03

[Hesham Soliman <hesham at elevatemobile.com>]

Hi Conny, 

We need the comments now, not after the document is updated :). This is WGLC
and we're updating the document as a result of reviews.

The bidirectionality issue was discussed and it was decided that there is no
case for it. This was sent to the list by the chairs. So we won't be adding
this to the draft. 

Hesham


On 20/10/09 7:25 AM, "Conny Larsson" <conny.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Comments (a detailed review will be done when the draft has been updated)
> 
> There has been a lengthy discussion on the mailing list regarding
> support for bidirectional transfer of flow descriptors. A number of
> arguments have been stated both in favor of bidirectional transfer and
> against it. I'm in favor of adding support for bidirectional transfer
> and believe it should be added according to what has previously been
> agreed in the WG charter.
> 
> There has also been a discussion about support for binary and ASCII flow
> descriptors. The draft is currently written only to fit the binary
> format. I see no reason for this approach. The draft could easily be
> changed to fit both formats.
> 
> I see no reason for draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03 to be forwarded to
> IESG before the above issues have been fixed.
> 
> Regards
> Conny
> 
> Laganier, Julien wrote:
>> Folks,
>> 
>> Hereby we're starting a two weeks WGLC on our "Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6
>> and NEMO Basic Support" document, available at the following URL:
>> 
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03>
>> 
>> Please review the specification, post your comments to the mailing list, and
>> state whether or not you think the document is ready to be forwarded to IESG
>> before 2009-10-20 6:00PM PST.
>>  
>> Thank you for your support.
>>  
>> --julien & marcelo, MEXT chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>