Re: [MEXT] Flow Bindings WGLC output: pre-04 version

[George Tsirtsis <tsirtsis at googlemail.com>]

Hi Conny,

I updated http://www.tsirtsis.com/draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-pre_04.txt
so that all of these are now marked as "Value "0" is reserved and
SHOULD NOT be used".

This seems to be the way it is handled in other RFCs since it allows a
future document (or even an implementation that knows what it is
doing) to overwrite it.

I hope that is OK.

George

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Conny Larsson
<conny.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> Well the idea was that it should be allowed to use for instance the "0"
> value and this should be interpreted as "this field is not used". As of
> today it says "MUST NOT be used" but I would like it to be treated as an
> allowed value.
>
> Regards
> Conny
>
> George Tsirtsis wrote:
>
> I do not exactly follow you but the "0" values are already reserved
> for all of these, and for FID and FID-PRI, "MUST NOT be used" is
> indicated.
>
> George
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, George Tsirtsis
> <tsirtsis at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks a lot for the many detailed online reviews during the WGLC as
> well as a number of reviews and suggestions received off-line.
> Although the reviews allowed us to clarify a number of issues, no
> significant changes had to be made to the protocol.
>
> I have updated the draft but since I missed the deadline I posted it here:
> http://www.tsirtsis.com/draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-pre_04.txt
>
> I will post this officially as soon as the Editor starts accepting I-Ds.
>
> Regards
> George
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>