[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MEXT] Fwd: About draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp-00



Hi, Alexandru.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
<alexandru.petrescu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jong-Hyouk Lee a écrit :
>>
>> Hi, Alexandru.
>>
>> I've check the previous draft you already made in 2007. Yes, I agress
>>  with you. The two approaches are very very similar. Actually, we have
>> needed to develop a mechanism to exchange the MNPs being used in
>>  vehicles for ITS. So, we designed and implemented it. Note that actually
>> we're working on an ITS-related project.
>>
>> I'm happy to see your previous draft. At least, it means that we didn't
>> take on a wrong way. I'd like to know how you're going on the your draft. Is
>> there any progessive?
>
> Well, yes, there is progress in the implementation of our draft.  We
> have now an implementation on linux which extends radvd.  We also have a
> wireshark dissector such as to show the messages properly in wireshark.

Wow. Yes, the implementation of MNPP (our implementation) is also
based on radvd. Actually, it is an extension (patch) of radvd v1.5. I
have not made the wireshark dissector, but extended radvdump also. So,
the modified radvdump can capture and provide essential information
from the modified RA message that carries the MNP being used in the
MR.

>
> However, I am afraid our dissector will not understand the messages
> developped by your draft and, worse, our Mobile Router will not
> understand the messages your Mobile Router sends, because the message
> formats are completely different between the two drafts (even if both
> carry MNPs in RAs).

Yes. Because we (you and I) have different message formats. ;-)

>
> What kind of implementation do you make/use?
>
> Alex

Many thanks.

-- 
IMARA Team, INRIA, France.
Jong-Hyouk Lee.

#email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com || jong-hyouk.lee (at) inria (dot) fr
#webpage: http://hurryon.googlepages.com/