[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-DIR]http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-storetr aceroutes-10.txtand RFC 4560



On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:53:31AM -0400, David Harrington wrote:
 
> I recommend the module defined in this document be given a unique name
> (e.g., ippm), and the datatypes defined in this module be named using
> a prefix derived from the module name, so the ippmInetAddress does not
> conflict with the yangInetAddress or the xsdmiInetAddress and so on,
> and neither definition is confused with the existing standard
> InetAddress datatype from the INET-ADDRESS-MIB.

The XML module has a namespace and a prefix for the namespace. Is
that not sufficient?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
MIB-DOCTORS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors