[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-DIR] FW: Recharter: ISMS
- To: Dave Nelson <d.b.nelson at comcast.net>
- Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-DIR] FW: Recharter: ISMS
- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:43:41 +0200
- Cc: "ops-dir at ietf.org" <ops-dir at ietf.org>, "aaa-doctors at ietf.org" <aaa-doctors at ietf.org>, "mib-doctors at ietf.org" <mib-doctors at ietf.org>, 'Pasi Eronen' <pasi.eronen at nokia.com>
- Delivered-to: mib-doctors at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <2DFEB3A3F37D43C9B5337339B9535DF0 at NEWTON603>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
- List-help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Mail-followup-to: Dave Nelson <d.b.nelson at comcast.net>, 'David B Harrington' <dbharrington at comcast.net>, "'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'" <dromasca at avaya.com>, "ops-dir at ietf.org" <ops-dir at ietf.org>, "aaa-doctors at ietf.org" <aaa-doctors at ietf.org>, "mib-doctors at ietf.org" <mib-doctors at ietf.org>, 'Pasi Eronen' <pasi.eronen at nokia.com>
- References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04017900B5 at 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <019a01c9e93b$3bfcdf20$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com> <2DFEB3A3F37D43C9B5337339B9535DF0 at NEWTON603>
- Reply-to: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:23:18AM +0200, Dave Nelson wrote:
> Having an AAA Subsystem might be a good thing. My question is whether it is
> a necessary thing, and whether it would be worth the extra time and effort.
RFC 3411 defines the Access Control Subsystem, see sections 3.1.2 and
4.3. David is perhaps right that the wording of the charter text is
not 100% RFC 3411 conform but since I believe it is good enough in
documenting what the WG wants to achieve.
I personally would have loved to have an initial ID for the RADIUS ACM
integration work available to support the recharerting discussion;
this is where the wording really matters. But it seems we won't get
such an initial document...
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>