Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-DIR] FW: Recharter: ISMS

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

Unless there are special reasons to keep some of the interactions
confidential I suggest to move the discussion to the isms mail list. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> [mailto:j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:44 AM
> To: Dave Nelson
> Cc: 'David B Harrington'; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); 
> ops-dir at ietf.org; aaa-doctors at ietf.org; mib-doctors at ietf.org; 
> 'Pasi Eronen'
> Subject: Re: [OPS-DIR] [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: Recharter: ISMS
> 
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:23:18AM +0200, Dave Nelson wrote:
>  
> > Having an AAA Subsystem might be a good thing.  My question 
> is whether 
> > it is a necessary thing, and whether it would be worth the 
> extra time and effort.
> 
> RFC 3411 defines the Access Control Subsystem, see sections 
> 3.1.2 and 4.3. David is perhaps right that the wording of the 
> charter text is not 100% RFC 3411 conform but since I believe 
> it is good enough in documenting what the WG wants to achieve.
> 
> I personally would have loved to have an initial ID for the 
> RADIUS ACM integration work available to support the 
> recharerting discussion; this is where the wording really 
> matters. But it seems we won't get such an initial document...
> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>