[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[MIB-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for August 27, 2009 Telechat
Please find below the preliminary agenda and package for the 8/27
telechat. Please let me know before 8/26 COB if there are any questions,
comments or concerns.
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: iesg-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
IESG Secretary
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
o draft-ietf-simple-xcap-diff-13.txt
An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Document Format for Indicating A
Change
in XML Configuration Access Protocol (XCAP) Resources (Proposed
Standard) -
1 of 7
Note: Ben Campbell is taking over as the document Shepherd
Token: Robert Sparks
o draft-ietf-ippm-multimetrics-11.txt
IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) for spatial and multicast (Proposed
Standard)
- 2 of 7
Note: The document shepherd is Matt Zekauskas (matt at internet2.edu).
Token: Lars Eggert
o draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-06.txt
OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 3
of 7
Token: Ross Callon
o draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-alarm-02.txt
Alarms in SYSLOG (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 7
Note: Scott Bradner (sob at harvard.edu) is the document shepherd.
Token: Dan Romascanu
o draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10.txt
Binding Revocation for IPv6 Mobility (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 7
Note: Julien Laganier (julien.laganier.ietf at googlemail.com) is the
document
shepherd.
Token: Jari Arkko
o draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-06.txt
Extended MKCOL for WebDAV (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 7
Note: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at greenbytes.de> agreed to
shepherd the document.
Token: Alexey Melnikov
o draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt
Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6 (Proposed
Standard) -
7 of 7
Note: Brian Haberman (brian at innovationslab.net) is the document
shepherd.
Token: Ralph Droms
2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
o draft-green-secsh-ecc-08.txt
Elliptic-Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure Shell Transport
Layer
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
Note: Jeffrey Hutzelman (jhutz at cmu.edu) is document shepherd.
Token: Tim Polk
o draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-08.txt
IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream
Submissions
(BCP) - 2 of 2
Note: There is no document shepherd
Token: Jari Arkko
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
o draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-07.txt
NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN (Experimental) - 1 of 4
Token: Magnus Westerlund
o draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-05.txt
MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows
(Informational)
- 2
of 4
Token: Ron Bonica
o draft-ietf-mext-aero-reqs-04.txt
Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements for Operational Use
in
Aeronautics and Space Exploration Mobile Networks (Informational) -
3
of 4
Note: Document Shepherd is Marcelo Bagnulo Braun
<marcelo at it.uc3m.es>
Token: Jari Arkko
o draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-04.txt
Application of Ethernet Pseudowires to MPLS Transport Networks
(Informational) - 4 of 4
Note: Matthew Bocci (matthew.bocci at alcatel-lucent.com) is the
document
shepherd
Token: Ralph Droms
3.1.2 Returning Item
o draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-02.txt
Extensions to OSPF to Support Mobile Ad Hoc Networking
(Experimental)
- 1
of 1
Token: Ross Callon
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
o Multicast Mobility (multimob) - 1 of 1
Token: Jari Arkko
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
o Internationalized Domain Names in Applications, Revised (idnabis) -
1
of 2
Token: Lisa Dusseault
o DNS Extensions (dnsext) - 2 of 2
Token: Ralph Droms