[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue

To: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net>, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de>, "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf at bwijnen.net>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:48:39 +0200
Cc: "Frank Chao $fchao$" <fchao at cisco.com>, "MIB Doctors $E-mail$" <mib-doctors at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: mib-doctors at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <046d01ca2713$a8fa5380$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7430DDE5E4D9481BBE60B9EC0BB01932 at BertLaptop><20090827053337.GA21220 at elstar.local> <046d01ca2713$a8fa5380$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com>
Thread-index: Acom2Fe4Mh2oqqOBSiKDYdKc9cc6mQAOVgtQAAC5g1A=
Thread-topic: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue

http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/X-rev-drafts/d4/IEEE8021-PAE-REV-
MIB-D4-0.txt 

I think that this is the last balloted version. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Harrington

> Is the proposed MIB available someplace (in text format)?
> 
> dbh
>

References:
- [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue
  - From: Bert Wijnen $IETF$
- Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue
  - From: David Harrington

Prev by Date: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue
Next by Date: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] RFC 4001 question
Previous by thread: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fw: Octet String as Index longer than 128 OIDs, 8021X-REV MIB issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread