[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
I have some good news to share. Randy Presuhn stepped ahead and accepted
to be the editor of 4181bis. Thanks, Randy!
I have two questions:
1. OPSAWG (which did not exist by the time 4181 was edited and
published) seems to me to be the natural home for 4181bis. Does anybody
see any problem with this? If all agree we shall move discussions to
opsawg at ietf.org
2. What should be the scope of 4181bis?
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard at pobox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:31 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder; MIB Doctors (E-mail); OPS Area (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
>
> Other than the copyright text that goes in MIB modules, the
> only issues that I know of that we all agreed were actually
> issues are the errata now on the RFC Editor site. Attached
> is an e-mail message on this subject sent to David Harrington
> and Bert Wijnen earlier this year.
>
> In my archives I found a discussion that tooks place between 16 Oct
> 2005 and 4 Jan 2006 as to whether RFC 4181 should be listed
> as updating STD 58 (RFCs 2578, 2579, and 2580), as suggested
> by Alfred Hoenes. We decided that the answer was NO, but in
> the process there was an inconclusive discussion as to
> whether the MUSTs in 4181 that go beyond the requirements of
> STD 58 (there are some in sec. 4.6.4) ought to be SHOULDs
> instead. The subject lines in the relevant threads are "RFC
> 4181 indeed updates RFC 2578..2580" and "Erratum for RFC
> 4181". If it's too much of a pain to search the mib-doctors
> archive, I can make the 28 messages that I saved from those
> threads available as a Unix mbox file.
>
> Mike Heard
>
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > Nothing as ordered as we would it to be. I remember
> discussions having
> > started a few times but we need to go back into the MIB Doctors
> > archives. There are also three verified errata (editorial stuff).
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
> > > [mailto:j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:55 PM
> > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > > Cc: C. M. Heard; MIB Doctors (E-mail); OPS Area (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: IESG Statement on
> > > Copyright
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:48:03PM +0200, Romascanu, Dan
> (Dan) wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are a number of issues that gathered around 4181
> that would
> > > > deserve attention if a willing editor is found.
> > >
> > > Do we have a list of those issues somewhere?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759
> Bremen, Germany
> > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> > >
> >
>