[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright



I think that we should consider also the following: 

1. Update the tools information. We refer now
http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-review-tools.html but is the information
there accurate, with smicng support aparently discontinued? 

2. information about templates - refer to RFC 5249 ? 

Also - is it time to move this discussion to OPSAWG? 

Dan
(speaking as contributor)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of C. M. Heard
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:27 PM
> To: David B Harrington
> Cc: 'MIB Doctors (E-mail)'; 'OPS Area (E-mail)'
> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
> 
> +1 also (though I really don't have a stake in the outcome).
> 
> One of the things that should probably be discussed is 
> whether the issues brought up in the attached e-mail 
> (downgrading some of the MUSTSs to SHOULDs) should be 
> addressed under the head of bug fixes.
> 
> //cmh
> 
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, David B Harrington wrote:
> > +1
> > dbh
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org
> > > [mailto:mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen 
> > > Schoenwaelder
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:22 AM
> > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > > Cc: C. M. Heard; MIB Doctors (E-mail); OPS Area (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [OPS-AREA] FW: IESG Statement on 
> > > Copyright
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:14:46AM +0200, Romascanu, Dan 
> (Dan) wrote:
> > > > I have some good news to share. Randy Presuhn stepped ahead and 
> > > > accepted to be the editor of 4181bis. Thanks, Randy!
> > > > 
> > > > I have two questions: 
> > > > 
> > > > 1. OPSAWG (which did not exist by the time 4181 was edited and
> > > > published) seems to me to be the natural home for 
> 4181bis.  Does 
> > > > anybody see any problem with this? If all agree we shall move 
> > > > discussions to opsawg at ietf.org
> > > > 
> > > > 2.  What should be the scope of 4181bis? 
> > > 
> > > Bug fixes and alignment to current IETF procedures and rules 
> > > (although the last thing might be an endless undertaking ;-). As 
> > > little rewrite as possible if you ask me.
> > > 
> > > /js
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 
> Bremen, Germany
> > > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> > > MIB-DOCTORS at ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors
> > > 
> > 
>