[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] normative references and REFERENCE clauses
I recommend these references be handled in the same way as IMPORT
references.
dbh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org
> [mailto:mib-doctors-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen
> Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:46 AM
> To: mib-doctors at ietf.org
> Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] normative references and REFERENCE clauses
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a MIB module in AUTH48 and the following question popped up.
> The MIB modules has something similar to this:
>
> FancyString TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
> -- description etc. removed with a normative reference to 3629
> REFERENCE
> "RFC 3629: UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646"
> SYNTAX OCTET STRING
>
> Since the content of this RFC to be normatively depends on RFC 3629,
I
> included RFC 3629 in the normative reference section. As RFC 4181
> points out, the RFC editor has a policy that you can't have a
> reference in an RFC that is not cited and they do not like to cite
the
> reference in the MIB module because the MIB module can be extracted
> and thus there is a dangling citation. Given this, it seems I have
two
> options:
>
> a) Remove RFC 3629 from the normative references. This is the
easiest
> solution but then any tools analyzing normative dependencies
> between RFCs will likely miss a normative reference, which sounds
> like a bad idea.
>
> b) Add extra text somewhere outside the MIB module to establish a
> citation to RFC 3629. This adds some verbiage but ensures that
the
> normative dependency gets properly recorded.
>
> The third option, namely to try to change the RFC editor policy, I
did
> not consider seriously. ;-)
>
> I checked RFC 4181 but it only has guidelines on IMPORTs. So do we
> generally prefer option a) or b). If there is a clear preference,
> should 4181bis be extended to handle the situation where REFERENCE
> clauses refer normatively to other documents that are not cited
> outside the MIB module?
>
> /js
>
> PS: I am bringing this question up here because I am editing a much
> larger document where this issue is much more dominant and so I
> want to be consistent.
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> MIB-DOCTORS at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors
>