[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [midcom] Confirming hums



Title: RE: [midcom] Confirming hums

That's my recollection.

I believe that Rohan will do the diagnostic document.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midcom-admin@ietf.org [mailto:midcom-admin@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Melinda Shore
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 07:36
> To: midcom@ietf.org
> Subject: [midcom] Confirming hums
>
>
> A couple of hums were taken at the meeting in Seoul, and we
> need to get those documented and confirmed on the mailing
> list.  I wasn't there so I'm extracting from the minutes - I
> hope that someone will correct me if I'm misreading what happened:
>
> 1) Updating STUN: Jonathan is going to update the STUN RFC. 
> It's going
>     to be done as an individual contribution with the expectation that
>     midcom participants would provide feedback.
>
> 2) The diagnostics will be moved from the STUN revision into a
>     new document - that is to say, they're no longer part of the STUN
>     protocol.
>
> 3) Fold the relevant portions of the MIB analysis document into the
>     midcom MIB itself, and not publish the MIB analysis
> (which isn't in
>     our charter, anyway)
>
> Please post any corrections/objections/elucidations to the
> mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Melinda
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> midcom@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
>