[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.txt
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:39:16PM -0500, Christopher A. Martin wrote:
> Just a thought...SNMP has always been the sore spot when it comes to
> managing devices behind a nat. Before snmp v3 I would never have asked
> rfor such functionality, but now...
See RFC 2962 for a discussion why the proper way to handle NATs is
the usage of SNMPv3 proxies. Note: I am not saying it is easy - just
that it is possible. ;-)
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom