Re: [midcom] Ready for last call?

[Juergen Quittek <quittek at ccrle.nec.de>]

Melinda,

--On 02.06.2004 14:03 h -0400 Melinda Shore wrote:

> There's been limited discussion of the MIB document.  Do you think
> it's ready for WG last call?

I do not think the current version of the MIDCOM MIB module is ready
for WG last call.

There is a list of open issues to be closed.  I am optimistic that
all but one can be solved for the next version (before cut-off date).
However, the first open issue listed in the document

>       - firewall resource usage indication is generic.
>         A more specific indication is required.

needs further work.

Particularly, we need to decide on

 - Is the coverage of firewalls appropriate?
   It would be great to get feedback from other people dealing with firewalls.

 - Do we need a stronger alignment with the IPSEC-SPD-MIB?
   (Eee draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-00.txt.)

Are IPSP people on this list or shall we cross-post the issue?

Thanks,

   Juergen
--
Juergen Quittek        quittek at ccrle.nec.de        Tel: +49 6221 90511-15
NEC Europe Ltd.,       Network Laboratories        Fax: +49 6221 90511-55
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany   http://www.ccrle.nec.de




_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom