[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [midcom] security recommendations in MIDCOM MIB draft



On 2007-7-3, at 14:33, ext Juergen Quittek wrote:
Now, Tim suggests to explicitly deprecate the use of (insecure) previous
versions of SNMP, for example with a phrase like


 "Deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED.
  Instead it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable
  cryptographic security."

Are there any opinions about adding such a phrase to the security
considerations?

This is a general applicability statement on the use of various SNMP versions and extensions, which IMO isn't for MIDCOM to make, at least not without prior review by the OPS area. But given the well-known problems with older versions of SNMP, maybe there already is a statement by the OPS area to that effect that the MIDCOM draft can simply point to?


Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom