[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[mif] definition of a MIF host



Hi,

(I'm only starting to follow this group, so I hope my question was not discussed before...)

I'd like to come back on the discussion on a MIF host as defined in draft-blanchet-mif-problem-statement-00.

In the former WG Monami6, we worked on the following document:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-monami6-multihoming-motivation-scenario-03.txt

where we also proposed a definition for a multihomed node. We came up with the following definitions:

   Interface

      A node's point of attachment to a link (as defined in [5])

   Multihomed Node

      A node (either a host or a router) is multihomed when it has
      several global IPv6 addresses to choose between, i.e. in the
      following cases when it is either:

* multi-prefixed: multiple prefixes are advertised on the link(s)
         the node is attached to, or.

      *  multi-interfaced: the node has multiple interfaces to choose
         between, on the same link or not.

Basically it says that a node is multi-homed as soon as it has multiple addresses of the same scope, from which it can choose to send data packets. What was good IMHO in this definition, is that it is concise and does not try to cover all cases where you can end up in that case.

So for the purpose of draft-blanchet-mif-problem-statement-00, I would suggest to keep the definition very short, and then have examples in another section that show how a host can be multi-homed / MIF (several interfaces, several administrative domains, etc).

In the same sense, I think that the bullet "Communications using these IP addresses may happen simultaneous and independently." should not be in the definition, but again, in some explanations of scenarios.

Regards,
Nicolas

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.