Re: [mif] New Version of draft-sarikaya-mif-dhcpv6solution

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at nokia.com>]

Hi,

thanks for clarifying. I think it's totally appropriate to make these  
sorts of ideas known to MIF participants even under the current charter.

Lats

On 2009-11-3, at 10:23, Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> Hi Lars,
>
> You are right, Lars, solution documents are out of scope for the
> current MIF WG charter.  We are currently chartered to work on (1) a
> problem statement, (2) a document that outlines current practices in
> this area, and (3) a document that analyzes those current practices.
>
> That said, there are several solution-space documents out there.  Some
> of them are in current IETF WGs (such as 6man or DHCP), and some of
> them are not chartered in the IETF yet.  Some people have chosen to
> make the MIF group aware of their ongoing work in this area.  We do
> understand that MIF is not chartered to do any solutions work at this
> time.
>
> Margaret
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2009-11-3, at 1:40, pierrick.seite at orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> > > A new version of draft-sarikaya-mif-dhcpv6solution
> > > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-mif-dhcpv6solution) has
> > > been
> > > posted.
> > >
> > > This document defines DHCPv6 options to configure the multi-homed
> > > host's
> > > routing table.
> >
> > maybe I'm misunderstanding the charter, but I was under the
> > impression that new protocols and protocol extensions are out of
> > scope?
> >
> > Lars_______________________________________________
> > mif mailing list
> > mif at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature