 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Jee, in that sense would it be possible to connect two FAs between two hierarchies or even an FA with two GFAs (shared FA)? In the latter case, what GFA would the FA advertise in its advertisements? Best Regards niko Jee J.Z. wrote: Hi Niko, I think this is a routing issue rathen than a Mobile IP issue. Direct connection may accelerate packets redirection from the old FA to the new FA, but registration process may not benefit from it. The architecture does not have to be purely tree-like I think. Regards, Jee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Niko A. Fikouras" <niko@comnets.uni-bremen.de> To: <mip4@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:51 AM Subject: [Mip4] accelerating smooth hand-over in regional tunnelHi all, I have been reading through the draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-tunnel-04.txt. I would like to know whether there has been any contemplation on enabling two plain low-level FAs (of the same or other hierarchy) to be directly connected. This would be a violation of hierarchical routing but may accelerate smooth hand-overs. Furthermore, this would not have to be a standard thing rather then only initiated by admins between FAs with lots of hand-offs between each other. Would that have any other protocol implications? have a nice day niko _______________________________________________ Mip4 mailing list Mip4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 |