Re: [Mip4] Secure Mobile Networking Deployment

To: William D Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [Mip4] Secure Mobile Networking Deployment
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:20:23 +0200
Cc: mip4@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.5.2.20030918081421.01822670@popserve.grc.nasa.gov>
List-help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>,<mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>,<mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030911083507.03b53850@po2.bbn.com><5.1.1.5.2.20030918081421.01822670@popserve.grc.nasa.gov>
Sender: mip4-admin@ietf.org

Hello William,

Thursday 18 September 2003, William wrote:
> There appears to be a lot of NAT / PAT and administrative 
> filtering issues that we are trying to resolve.  Hopefully, what we learn 
> with IPv4 can be applied to IPv6.  We will pass whatever useful information 
> we can on to these groups.

As I've co-authored the RFC on NAT traversal for MIP, I'd be very
intreresting in hearing about your experiences in this area in particular.
Have you implemented RFC 3519 NAT traversal mechanisms, or are you trying
to work around this in some other manner?

	Regards,
		Henrik

Attachment: pgp00017.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [Mip4] How widely deployed is MIPv4?
  - From: Sharon Gowan
- [Mip4] Secure Mobile Networking Deployment
  - From: William D Ivancic

Prev by Date: [Mip4] Mip4 workgroup status page
Next by Date: [Mip4] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mip4-aaa-nai-00.txt
Previous by thread: [Mip4] Secure Mobile Networking Deployment
Next by thread: [Mip4] RE: Request for text proposal for your scenario
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Mip4] Secure Mobile Networking Deployment

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.