RE: [Mip4] 3012bis
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Mip4] 3012bis
Yes, thanks, Jayshree - I think we are ready to send this to the IESG,
but I just noticed that there is no IPR or copyright statement in the
current version that is in the drafts directory.
This issue has come up several times before, so I'm copying the whole
list to make sure we can get it right from now on. All editors,
please make sure that you have two sections like the following in all
drafts that you expect to progress within the working group:
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on
the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances
of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt
made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
are included on all such copies and derivative works. However,
this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by
removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society
or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose
of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures
for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on
an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
These come from RFC 2026, Section 10.4 (A), (B), and (C). Drafts will
not be submitted to the IESG without this text.
When you know of IPR that pertains to a draft, you should also insert
the text from section (D) in the IPR statement:
"The IETF has been notified of intellectual property rights
claimed in regard to some or all of the specification contained
in this document. For more information consult the online list
of claimed rights."
You can also add whatever details about the IPR (patent numbers, etc)
you feel are appropriate in the IPR statement or put in other text
that may be required by your company, but the above IPR statement must
be present in its entirety.
Jayshree, I think you can update the one typo you found at the same
time that you add these; please also remember to upload your source to
http://www.mip4.org/drafts/rfc3012bis/
At the same time that you submit the text to internet-drafts.
Unfortunately, the submission won't be processed until after the
upcoming IETF, so we are stuck until then, but hopefully we can take
care of this immediately following the meeting.
Thanks,
-Pete
Ali.Akgun@utstar.com writes:
>
> thanks very much for the update, Jayshree.
>
> ali
>
>
>
>
> "Jayshree Bharatia" <jayshree@nortelnetworks.com>@ietf.org on 02/18/2004
> 11:13:35 AM
>
> Sent by: mip4-admin@ietf.org
>
>
> To: Ali Akgun/UTStarcom@UTStarcom
> cc: mip4@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Mip4] 3012bis
>
>
> Hi Ali,
>
> We had couple of issues related to RFC3012bis draft. These issues and
> solutions were discussed in last IETF meeting. As per the outcome, we don't
> need any explicit text in RFC3012bis document. There is one typo in "Change
> history" section of draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-00.txt. Apart from this, the
> draft is pretty much completed now unless I hear otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayshree
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ali.Akgun@utstar.com [mailto:Ali.Akgun@utstar.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:59 PM
> > To: mip4@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Mip4] 3012bis
> >
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Can anyone update us on the status of the 3012bis draft?
> >
> > thanks much,
> > ali
--
Mip4 mailing list
Mip4@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.