RE: [Mip4] Request to consider FMIPv4 as a working group document

[Kent Leung <kleung at cisco.com>]

Oops, I missed one of your comments.

At 01:41 PM 3/18/2005 -0600, Narayanan Vidya-CVN065 wrote:
> Hi Kent,
> What you are implying here seems to be that in order to have a fast 
> handoff solution, the MN must be using an FA CoA - did I get that right?
>
> If so, that seems a little restrictive to me. There are scenarios where 
> the MN may be using a CCoA and registering through an FA.


Hmm, I haven't seen a deployment case for this scenario.  My main point is to
focus activities around deployments, which is a charter item.  As such 
needs arise,
we can address them then.  Just trying to simplify document.

Kent


--
     |           |                   Kent Leung
    :|:         :|:                  IP Mobility Development
   :|||:       :|||:                 Internet Technologies Division
  :|||||||:   :|||||||:              Voice: 408.526.5030
.:|||||||||:.:|||||||||:.             Fax:   408.525.1653
 c i s c o S y s t e m s             Email: kleung at cisco.com

--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
   Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
    Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/