![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi Charlie,
As part of this discussion, I showed some results which indicate very
good performance for FMIPv4, suitable for handling interactive voice
applications. I probably have the PowerPoint presentation around somewhere if needed.
Yes, I need these slides, please send in if easily available for you, thank you.
I am interested to find out about "hard" limits on the interruption times that a human user of a interactive voice IP application is ready to tolerate. During some IP and non-IP discussions, very often the numbers 100ms or 200ms come up. But for some reason I'm unable to identify a written report/paper, eventually with some "hands-on" non-simulated experience to determine this "tolerable delay". Anything like a I-D report or ppt slides or journal/conference paper applies, thanks,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/