Re: [Mip4] RE: Differences between Low Latency Handovers and FMIP v4

[Rajeev Koodli <rajeev at iprg.nokia.com>]

Hello Henrik,

I believe that we should have a single solution for subnet
mobility. And, you may be aware that MIPSHOP is
considering "AAA Keys for Handover" as one of the
mechanisms to establish MN - AR security association.
We could get the keys for IPv4 as well.
In addition, there was discussion about extending the "SEND-based
key derivation for handover" for IPv4 as well. (Disclaimer: James and
myself are co-authors on this draft).

So, we could have a PS solution for IPv4 subnet mobility, just
as MIPSHOP is attempting to define one.

My 2 cents..

-Rajeev



Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

on 2005-03-22 6:40 pm James Kempf said the following:

<snip a lot of stuff on which I basically agree>

  

Anyway, if this WG was serious about its charter to focus on deployment, it
would start up an activity to standardize WLAN switching "IP mobility".
    

Interesting point.  

If we do propose to take this up in the new charter proposal, do we
have people who would be willing to spend some time and energy on
this?

	Henrik


  

-- 
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/