Re: [Mip4] RE: Differences between Low Latency Handovers and FMIP v4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mip4] RE: Differences between Low Latency Handovers and FMIP v4





James Kempf wrote:

As for what's to standardize, essentially, these protocols work like
Postreg. So there would need to be some agreement about the inter-switch
signaling to set up the tunnel, and the actual tunnel type. I don't know
offhand what kind of tunnel is used, I suspect each switch might use a
different tunnel type.



Okay. Why do we need to standardize inter-switch communication? Are you
considering the switch also as a L3 device from a MIP MN perspective?

-Rajeev

           jak






-- Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.