![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
James Kempf wrote:
As for what's to standardize, essentially, these protocols work like Postreg. So there would need to be some agreement about the inter-switch signaling to set up the tunnel, and the actual tunnel type. I don't know offhand what kind of tunnel is used, I suspect each switch might use a different tunnel type.
Okay. Why do we need to standardize inter-switch communication? Are you considering the switch also as a L3 device from a MIP MN perspective?
-Rajeev
jak
-- Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/