Re: [Mip4] A query about CCOA..
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mip4] A query about CCOA..
Hi Chaitra. The doubts are legitimate as I don't think RFC 3344 covers
the specifics of move detection in CCoA mode. However, CCoA mode
requires the MN to obtain an IP address on the access network.
Typically this is DHCP or PPP/IPCP. Both provide the subnet prefix
which allows the MN to detect if it has changed subnet. In addition,
the IP address would have also changed as well in this case.
Hope that helps.
Kent
At 10:03 AM 4/1/2005 +0530, Chaitra M R wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry if this question sounds naive. I am new into the mobility
realm and hence have many doubts. Please bear with me.
This doubt is about co-located care of address. From what I
understand, using co-located address does not necessiate the
services of FA right?
Given that the foreign network on to which the MN has moved doesn't
have an FA and the MN uses CCOA, how can a mobile node determine
that it has moved to a foreign network?
Regards,
Chaitra
--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
--
| | Kent Leung
:|: :|: IP Mobility Development
:|||: :|||: Internet Technologies Division
:|||||||: :|||||||: Voice: 408.526.5030
.:|||||||||:.:|||||||||:. Fax: 408.525.1653
c i s c o S y s t e m s Email: kleung at cisco.com
--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.