Re: [Mip4] Re: [Fwd: COMMENT: draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mip4] Re: [Fwd: COMMENT: draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis]



Pete McCann wrote:
Let's have some discussion on this review.

RFC 3012 is widely implemented in cdma2000 networks and this
update provides some (in my opinion) much needed, but somewhat
minor, clarifications to the handling of the challenge values
to provide for greater interoperability between MNs and FAs.
I do not think we should give up on it lightly.

That's exactly why I recorded an Abstain ballot, to express reservations but without automatically blocking progress.

Please take guidance from Margaret on what changes to make.

    Brian


-- Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.