RE: [Mip4] Proxy Mobile IPv4 in the WG charter

["Damic, Damjan" <damjan.damic at siemens.com>]

Hello,

I believe the Proxy MIP4 is worth the effort, and that MIP4 WG is the
appropriate place to address it.
Even though the idea originated by a different SDO, people (including
myself) believe having something standardized through IETF gives the
matter additional meaning and credibility.
A group work in IETF on such an item could therefore serve to provide a
critical feedback to the existing proposal, and possibly to align the
specification in the way the WG perceives it should be (as already
pointed by Alex and George).

Kind regards,
Damjan

 
>Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:51:52 -0800
>From: "Kent Leung \(kleung\)" <kleung at cisco.com>
>Subject: [Mip4] Proxy Mobile IPv4 in the WG charter
>To: <mip4 at ietf.org>
>	
>
>Hi.  The draft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-01.txt draft describes 
>using Mobile
>IPv4 in proxy mode to provide network-based mobility management.  There
>will need to be some more work on the draft.  But wanted to get some
>sense of support for Proxy Mobile IPv4 in this WG.  Certainly there are
>a few SDOs which have either adopted or interested in such mechanism.
> 
>Do folks want to take this on as a WG item eventually?
> 
>Kent

--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/