Let me clarify that we will be updating our draft,
draft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode, accordingly to address the gaps.
Kent
-----Original Message-----
From: Kent Leung (kleung)
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:29 AM
To: Jun AWANO; mip4
Subject: RE: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4]
Questionaboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode)
Hi Jun.
We are working with WiMAX Forum members to address the technical gaps in
the draft. Currently, we are collecting the review comments and will
update the draft accordingly.
Kent
-----Original Message-----
From: Jun AWANO [mailto:j-awano at az.jp.nec.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:23 PM
To: mip4
Subject: pmipv4 of WiMAX forum (Re: [Mip4] Question
aboutdraft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode)
Hi, kent
Please let me ask about your draft.
Your draft says,
"This document describes WiMAX Forum and 3GPP2 solution for the base
Proxy Mobile IPv4 function which enables another entity to provide
mobility support on behalf of an unaltered and mobility-unaware IPv4
device."
But, I think that the PMIPv4 described in your draft seems different
from the one specified in WiMAX Forum spec (WiMAX Forum Network
Architechture stage2/3).
Do you plan to change the PMIPv4 spec of WiMAX Forum to match your
draft?
Best Regards,
Jun