RE: [Mip4] RFC 3344 and draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-05.txtIANA Considerations

["Marks, Robert" <rmarks at starentnetworks.com>]

Hi Acee,

 

I’m afraid I misunderstood your email. I fully agree with removing the extension only from section 6.3.

 

BR,

Bob

 

---

From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee at redback.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:36 AM
To: Marks, Robert
Cc: Charles E. Perkins; mip4 at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mip4] RFC 3344 and draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-05.txtIANA Considerations

 

Hi Bob, 

Since 6.3 documents IANA code-points for "Extensions to Mobile IP Registration Messages" and the referenced text from section 1.8 specifically restricts the listed extensions to ICMP Router Discovery messages, I'd guess that the inclusion of the One-byte Padding in section 6.3 was simply a cut-and-paste error that was never caught. 

 

Luckily, IANA never included it or it got caught in the IANA review. See the following excerpt from http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobileip-numbers

 

<<< snip, snip, snip >>>

-- 
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/