Re: [Mip4] AD review of mip4-service

[<jouni.korhonen at teliasonera.com>]

Hi Jari,


> I've done my AD review on this document. I have one technical problem 
> and two minor editorial issues:

Thanks for the review!

> The technical issue is the specification for the service index in 
> Section 3. It was not possible for me to understand how the involved 
> nodes employ this field and what they should do with it. In addition, 
> the specification differs from RFC 5149 which did not have such a 
> functionality. My recommended resolution is to remove the field.

Right. The Index was a recent addition and I have no problem of
removing it.

> >    o  In absence of a specifically indicated service the 
> home agent MUST
> This does not feel logically a part of the bulleted list. 
> Please make it 
> a regular paragraph.

Ok.

> > may restricts
> >   
> 
> may restrict

Ok.

> Can these three issues addressed in a new revision of the spec?

Yes. Will ship a revised I-D asap.

> Jari

Cheers,
	Jouni

--
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/