Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support



Hi all,

I support this work since there is enough interest and also it is very
useful.

BR,
Mohana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mip4-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mip4-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> McCann Peter-A001034
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:48 PM
> To: mip4 at ietf.org
> Cc: Henrik Levkowetz
> Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Multiple Tunnel Support
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on
> the multiple tunnel support and flow movement, as described in
> these two drafts:
> 
> draft-gundavelli-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-00.txt
> draft-tsirtsis-mip4-flowmove-01.txt
> 
> The sense of the room seemed to be that we should combine these
> two drafts and take the result on as a new work item.
> 
> This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
> respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree
> or disagree, and state your reasons why.
> 
> -Pete
> 
> --
> Mip4 mailing list: Mip4 at ietf.org
>     Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
>      Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
> Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.